[Natural 5α-reductase inhibitors in treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia].

Benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH) is a common disease of the male urinary system, and its incidence rate in China is increasing. However, the mechanism underlying the pathogenesis of BPH remains unclear. Some studies demonstrated that the incidence of BPH was related to the change in the levels of steroid hormones. Too high content of dihydrotestosterone(DHT) in the body may cause BPH and other related diseases. Testosterone(T) is converted to DHT by 5α-reductase(SRD5A). By inhibiting the activity of this enzyme, the production of DHT can be reduced, and then the incidence of BPH can be lowered. Therefore, it has drawn great attention to screen and discover safer and more effective 5α-reductase inhibitors from natural medicines to treat prostatic hyperplasia without affecting the physiological function of men. This review summarizes the characteristics and tissue distribution of 5α-reductase, the discovery of 5α-reductase inhibitors in traditional Chinese medicine and natural medicines, 5α-reductase inhibitors commonly used in clinical practice and their side effects, as well as the animal models of prostatic hyperplasia and common detection indicators, aiming to provide a reference for more in-depth understanding and research about BPH and development of drugs.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose oral minoxidil in the management of androgenetic alopecia.

INTRODUCTION: Treating alopecia can be challenging. The available treatments are topical minoxidil, low-dose oral minoxidil (LDOM), and 5-α reductase inhibitors like finasteride and dutasteride. Only topical minoxidil and finasteride 1 mg daily are FDA-approved, while the rest are used off-label. Recent research has suggested that oral minoxidil may be a safe and effective treatment for both female androgenetic alopecia (female AGA) and male androgenetic alopecia (male AGA). AREAS COVERED: In this review, we explore the pharmacokinetics, mechanism of action, safety, and efficacy of oral minoxidil. Additionally, we discuss its effectiveness compared to other treatments available for female AGA and male AGA. EXPERT OPINION: LDOM has demonstrated a favorable efficacy and safety profile in several trials. Subsequently, its use for the treatment of male AGA and female AGA is increasing. However, its use remains off-label, and through increased usage, we will get a better idea of the best dosage and monitoring guidelines. LDOM has also been used with some effectiveness in other forms of hair loss.

Post-Finasteride Syndrome And Post-Ssri Sexual Dysfunction: Two Clinical Conditions Apparently Distant, But Very Close.

Post-finasteride syndrome and post-SSRI sexual dysfunction, are two poorly explored clinical conditions in which men treated for androgenetic alopecia with finasteride or for depression with SSRI antidepressants show persistent side effects despite drug suspension (e.g., sexual dysfunction, psychological complaints, sleep disorders). Because of some similarities in the symptoms, common pathological mechanisms are proposed here. Indeed, as discussed, clinical studies and preclinical data obtained so far suggest an important role for brain modulators (i.e., neuroactive steroids), neurotransmitters (i.e., serotonin, and cathecolamines), and gut microbiota in the context of the gut-brain axis. In particular, the observed interconnections of these signals in these two clinical conditions may suggest similar etiopathogenetic mechanisms, such as the involvement of the enzyme converting norepinephrine into epinephrine (i.e., phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase). However, despite the current efforts, more work is still needed to advance the understanding of these clinical conditions in terms of diagnostic markers and therapeutic strategies.

Exploring rat corpus cavernosum alterations induced by finasteride treatment and withdrawal.

Despite its efficacy for treating androgenetic alopecia, finasteride, an inhibitor of 5α-reductase (i.e., the enzyme converting testosterone, T, into dihydrotestosterone, DHT), is associated with several side effects including sexual dysfunction (e.g., erectile dysfunction). These side effects may persist after drug suspension, inducing the so-called post-finasteride syndrome (PFS). The effects of subchronic treatment with finasteride (i.e., 20 days) and its withdrawal (i.e., 1 month) in rat corpus cavernosum have been explored here. Data obtained show that the treatment was able to decrease the levels of the enzyme 5α-reductase type II in the rat corpus cavernosum with increased T and decreased DHT levels. This local change in T metabolism was linked to mechanisms associated with erectile dysfunction. Indeed, by targeted metabolomics, we reported a decrease in the nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity, measured by the citrulline/arginine ratio and confirmed by the decrease in NO2 levels, and a decrease in ornithine transcarbamylase (OTC) activity, measured by citrulline/ornithine ratio. Interestingly, the T levels are negatively correlated with NOS activity, while those of DHT are positively correlated with OTC activity. Finasteride treatment also induced alterations in the levels of other molecules involved in the control of penile erection, such as norepinephrine and its metabolite, epinephrine. Indeed, plasma levels of norepinephrine and epinephrine were significantly increased and decreased, respectively, suggesting an impairment of these mediators. Interestingly, these modifications were restored by suspension of the drug. Altogether, the results reported here indicate that finasteride treatment, but not its withdrawal, affects T metabolism in the rat corpus cavernosum, and this alteration was linked to mechanisms associated with erectile dysfunction. Data here reported could also suggest that the PFS sexual side effects are more related to dysfunction in a sexual central control rather than peripheral compromised condition.

Cardiovascular Outcomes of α-Blockers vs 5-α Reductase Inhibitors for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Importance: The most prescribed class of medications for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is α-blockers (ABs). However, the cardiovascular safety profile of these medications among patients with BPH is not well understood. Objective: To compare the safety of ABs vs 5-α reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) for risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This active comparator, new-user cohort study was conducted using insurance claims data from a 20% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries from 2007 to 2019 to evaluate the 1-year risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Males aged 66 to 90 years were indexed into the cohort at new use of an AB or 5-ARI. Twelve months of continuous enrollment and at least 1 diagnosis code for BPH within 12 months prior to initiation were required. Data were analyzed from January 2007 through December 2019. Exposures: Exposure was defined by a qualifying prescription fill for an AB or 5-ARI after at least 12 months without a prescription for these drug classes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Follow-up began at a qualified refill for the study drug. Primary study outcomes were hospitalization for heart failure (HF), composite major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; hospitalization for stroke, myocardial infarction, or death), composite MACE or hospitalization for HF, and death. Inverse probability of treatment and censoring-weighted 1-year risks, risk ratios (RRs), and risk differences (RDs) were estimated for each outcome. Results: Among 189 868 older adult males, there were 163 829 patients initiating ABs (mean [SD] age, 74.6 [6.2] years; 579 American Indian or Alaska Native [0.4%], 5890 Asian or Pacific Islander [3.6%], 9179 Black [5.6%], 10 610 Hispanic [6.5%], and 133 510 non-Hispanic White [81.5%]) and 26 039 patients initiating 5-ARIs (mean [SD] age, 75.3 [6.4] years; 76 American Indian or Alaska Native [0.3%], 827 Asian or Pacific Islander [3.2%], 1339 Black [5.1%], 1656 Hispanic [6.4%], and 21 605 non-Hispanic White [83.0%]). ABs compared with 5-ARIs were associated with an increased 1-year risk of MACE (8.95% [95% CI, 8.81%-9.09%] vs 8.32% [95% CI, 7.92%-8.72%]; RR = 1.08 [95% CI, 1.02-1.13]; RD per 1000 individuals = 6.26 [95% CI, 2.15-10.37]), composite MACE and HF (RR = 1.07; [95% CI, 1.03-1.12]; RD per 1000 individuals = 7.40 [95% CI, 2.88-11.93 ]), and death (RR = 1.07; [95% CI, 1.01-1.14]; RD per 1000 individuals = 3.85 [95% CI, 0.40-7.29]). There was no difference in risk for HF hospitalization alone. Conclusions and Relevance: These results suggest that ABs may be associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes compared with 5-ARIs. If replicated with more detailed confounder data, these results may have important public health implications given these medications' widespread use.

Exploring the Enigma of 5-ARIs Resistance in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Paving the Path for Personalized Medicine.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite the widespread utilization of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) for managing benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), certain BPH patients exhibit unresponsiveness to 5-ARIs therapy. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current perspectives on the mechanisms of 5-ARIs resistance in BPH patients and integrates potential biomarkers and underlying therapeutic options for 5-ARIs resistance. These findings may facilitate the development of novel or optimize more effective treatment options, and promote personalized medicine for BPH. RECENT FINDINGS: The pathways contributing to resistance against 5-ARIs in certain BPH patients encompass epigenetic modifications, shifts in hormone levels, autophagic processes, and variations in androgen receptor structures, and these pathways may ultimately be attributed to inflammation. Promisingly, novel biomarkers, including intravesical prostatic protrusion, inflammatory factors, and single nucleotide polymorphisms, may offer predictive insights into the responsiveness to 5-ARIs therapy, empowering physicians to fine-tune treatment strategies. Additionally, on the horizon, GV1001 and mTOR inhibitors have emerged as potential alternative therapeutic modalities for addressing BPH in the future. After extensive investigation into BPH's pathological processes and molecular landscape, it is now recognized that diverse pathophysiological mechanisms may contribute to different BPH subtypes among individuals. This insight necessitates the adoption of personalized treatment strategies, moving beyond the prevailing one-size-fits-all paradigm centered around 5-ARIs. The imperative for early identification of individuals prone to treatment resistance will drive physicians to proactively stratify risk and adapt treatment tactics in future practice. This personalized medicine approach marks a progression from the current standard treatment model, emerging as the future trajectory in BPH management.

[Hepatotoxicity by tamsulosin / dutasteride: report of a probable case]. / Hepatotoxicidad por tamsulosina / dutasterida: reporte de un caso probable.

Tamsulosin and dutasteride are drugs widely used to treat benign prostatic hypertrophy. having a good safety profile. There are few reports of liver injury associated with the use of tamsulosin; however, there are no reports of hepatic toxicity from the use of dutasteride and the combined use of tamsulosin/dutasteride. We present the case of a 64-year-old man who developed liver injury after the combined use of tamsulosin/dutasteride, developing a pattern of hepatocellular damage and acute hepatitis symptoms. Viral, autoimmune, and metabolic storage diseases of the liver were ruled out, as well as biliary pathology by means of abdominal ultrasound and resonance cholangiography. In the causality evaluation, CIOMS-RUCAM presented: 6 points (probable) and Naranjo: 4 points (possible). The patient presented a clinical and laboratory response after discontinuing the drug.

The Cardiovascular Safety of Five-Alpha-Reductase Inhibitors Among Men with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Five-alpha reductase inhibitors (5αRIs) are used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). However, the cardiovascular effects of 5αRIs remain poorly understood. The study objective was to compare the rate of hospitalization for heart failure among men with BPH prescribed 5αRIs to that of men with BPH not prescribed BPH medications. METHODS: Using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked with hospitalization and vital statistics data, we conducted a population-based cohort study among patients newly diagnosed with BPH. We defined exposure as the current use of 5αRIs, current use of alpha-blockers, and no current use of BPH medications in a time-varying approach. The primary endpoint was hospitalization for heart failure, and secondary endpoints were myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death. We used time-dependent Cox-proportional hazards models to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Our cohort included 94,440 men with incident BPH. A total of 3893 hospitalizations for heart failure occurred over 527,660 person-years of follow-up (incidence rate 7.38; 95% CI, 7.15-7.61, per 1000 person-years). Compared with no current use of BPH medications, current use of 5αRIs was not associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HR 0.94; 95% CI, 0.86-1.03), myocardial infarction (HR 0.92; 95% CI, 0.81-1.05), stroke (HR 0.94; 95% CI, 0.85-1.05), or cardiovascular death (HR 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: The use of 5αRIs was not associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death compared with non-use.

Litigation associated with 5-alpha-reductase-inhibitor use: A Canadian legal database review.

INTRODUCTION: 5α-reductase inhibitors (5ARI) are commonly prescribed medications. There is ongoing controversy about the adverse events of these medications. The aim of this study is to characterize lawsuits in Canada involving medical complications of 5ARIs use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Legal cases were queried from CanLII. Cases were included if they involved a party taking a 5ARI who alleged an adverse event. Relevant full cases were retained, and pertinent characteristics were extracted with the help of a legal expert. RESULTS: Our deduplicated search yielded 67 unique legal documents from December 2013 to February 2019. Twelve of these documents met the inclusion criteria (representing 3 cases, considering each case had several hearings). The medical complaints filed by the plaintiffs were all related to medication side effects (n = 3, 100%). The plaintiffs were commonly patients themselves. Defendants were exclusively pharmaceutical companies. Persistent erectile dysfunction after stopping the medication was cited as a side effect in all complaints. The prescriptions were made for male pattern hair loss (n = 3, 100%) in all cases. All cases represent class actions brought by the plaintiffs, and they have been certified by their respective court. However, the cases are still ongoing. CONCLUSION: While 5ARI use has been linked to undesired sexual side effects, there have been few litigations on this issue in Canada. Persisting sexual dysfunction after stopping the medication is the only complaint presented in legal action. To date, no judgment against a physician or pharmaceutical company was identified. Cases are still ongoing.

Association Between 5α-Reductase Inhibitors and Prostate Cancer Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Importance: Recently, several large, high-quality analyses have shown opposing results regarding the association between 5α-reductase inhibitor (5-ARI) use and prostate cancer (PCa) mortality. Objective: To systematically evaluate the current evidence regarding 5-ARI use and PCa mortality. Data Sources: A literature search began in and was conducted through August 2022 using PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Study Selection: Studies were deemed eligible if they included male patients of any age who were 5-ARI users and were compared with those who were nonusers if they analyzed PCa mortality in randomized clinical trials and prospective or retrospective cohort studies. Data Extraction and Synthesis: This study was reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were extracted from published articles. Data analysis was performed in August 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was PCa mortality among 5-ARI users vs nonusers. The inverse variance method with adjusted HRs and random-effect models were used to determine the association between 5-ARI use and PCa mortality. Two subgroup analyses were performed to assess the effect of 2 main confounders: prostate-specific antigen level and PCa diagnosis at baseline. Results: Among 1200 unique records screened, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 3 243 575 patients were included: 138 477 users of 5-ARI and 3 105 098 nonusers. There was no statistically significant association between 5-ARI use and PCa mortality (adjusted HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.80-1.35; P = .79). No significant association was found when the analysis was restricted to studies that excluded patients with a diagnosis of PCa at baseline (adjusted HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.60-1.67; P = .99) or the analysis was restricted to prostate-specific antigen-adjusted studies (adjusted HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.57-1.03; P = .08). Conclusions and Relevance: This systematic review and meta-analysis, which draws on 2 decades of epidemiologic literature and includes more than 3 million patients, found no statistically significant association between 5-ARI use and PCa mortality but provides important data to inform clinical care.

Long-term risk of benign prostatic hyperplasia-related surgery and acute urinary retention in men treated with 5-alpha reductase inhibitor versus alpha-blocker monotherapy in routine clinical care.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the risk of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-related surgery and acute urinary retention (AUR) in men treated with 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor (5-ARI) versus alpha-blocker monotherapy in routine clinical care over 15 years of follow-up. METHODS: Using population-based Danish Health registries, we identified all new-users of 5-ARI or alpha-blocker monotherapy in Denmark, 1997-2017. We defined an index date 180 days after the date of first prescription and included men who redeemed at least one additional prescription before the index date. We used multiple imputation to replace missing prostate-specific antigen values. We performed propensity score-weighted Cox regression to estimate weighted hazard ratios (wHRs) and cumulative incidence function to estimate weighted cumulative risks of BPH-related surgery and AUR in intention to treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses. RESULTS: We included 18,421 and 95,984 men treated with 5-ARI and alpha-blocker monotherapy, respectively. Overall, treatment with 5-ARI monotherapy was associated with a reduced risk of BPH-related surgery (ITT wHR = 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68-0.78), PP wHR = 0.77 (95% CI: 0.70-0.84) and AUR (ITT wHR = 0.73 (95% CI: 0.67-0.78), PP wHR = 0.75 (95% CI: 0.66-0.84). The 15-year risk of BPH-related surgery in men treated with 5-ARI versus alpha-blocker monotherapy was 14.8% (95% CI: 14.1%-15.5%) versus 19.1% (95% CI: 18.7%-19.5%) in the ITT analysis and 13.8% (95% CI: 12.6%-14.9%) versus 17.5% (95% CI: 16.9%-18.0%) in the PP analysis. The 15-year risk of AUR in men treated with 5-ARI versus alpha-blocker was 13.0% (95% CI: 12.3%-13.6%) versus 16.6% (95% CI: 16.3%-17.0%) in the ITT analysis and 12.6% (95%: 11.3%-14.0%) versus 16.9% (95% CI: 16.3%-17.6%) in the PP analysis. CONCLUSION: Treatment with 5-ARI versus alpha-blocker monotherapy in routine clinical care was associated with a reduced risk of BPH-related surgery and AUR for up to 15 years of follow-up. After 15 years of follow-up, the relative risk reduction was 21%-25% and the absolute risk reduction was 4%.

Risk Analysis of Prostate Cancer Development Following Five-alpha Reductase Inhibitor Treatment for Benign Prostate Hyperplasia.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The clinical hazard of prostate cancer development after five-alpha reductase inhibitors (5ARI) treatment among benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) patients is still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the epidemiological features of BPH patients treated in a single institute to identify risk factors associated with prostate cancer development. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients who were diagnosed with BPH and received alpha blockers (AB) only or 5ARI between January 2007 and December 2012 and followed up until death or December 2020. The primary study outcome was prostate cancer and high-grade prostate cancer. RESULTS: Of the 5,122 included patients, 14.9% (762/5,122) received 5ARI during their BPH treatment. The median age, initial prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels and the PSA change were significantly higher in the 5ARI group compared to those of the AB group. The prostate cancer diagnosis rate was higher in the 5ARI group, and the percentage of high-grade prostate cancer was not different between the two groups. In total, 1,715 (33.5%) patients were recorded dead, and the median follow-up period was longer in the 5ARI group. In Cox regression analysis, only age and initial PSA levels were significantly associated with prostate cancer. Late PSA was the only independent factor associated with high-grade prostate cancer development. CONCLUSION: Our real-world data revealed that age, initial PSA, and late PSA levels were associated with prostate cancer and high-grade prostate cancer diagnosis among BPH patients. Furthermore, 5ARI use had no effect on prostate cancer patient survival. However, PSA assessment during follow-up is still required in our institutional practice to avoid delayed diagnosis.

Association of 5α-Reductase Inhibitors With Dementia, Depression, and Suicide.

Importance: In recent decades, there has been increased interest in the possible adverse neurological effects of 5α-reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs), which have been used mainly for benign prostatic hyperplasia and androgenic alopecia. Numerous studies and reports have indicated associations of 5-ARIs with depression and suicide. However, most of these studies had methodological shortcomings, and very little is known about the potential association of 5-ARIs with dementia. Objective: To investigate the association of 5-ARI use with all-cause dementia, Alzheimer disease, vascular dementia, depression, and suicide. Design, Setting, and Participants: This Swedish register-based cohort study included 2 236 876 men aged 50 to 90 years between July 1, 2005, and December 31, 2018. Statistical analyses were performed from September 15, 2021, to May 25, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: A diagnosis of all-cause dementia, Alzheimer disease, vascular dementia, depression, or completed suicide. Exposures: A recorded prescription in the Swedish national prescription register of finasteride or dutasteride and duration of use. Results: Of 2 236 876 men (median age at the start of follow-up, 55 years [IQR, 50-65 years] and at treatment initiation, 73 years [IQR, 66-80 years]), 70 645 (3.2%) started finasteride treatment, and 8774 (0.4%) started dutasteride treatment. Men taking finasteride or dutasteride were at increased risk of all-cause dementia (finasteride: hazard ratio [HR], 1.22 [95% CI, 1.17-1.28]; dutasteride: HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.01-1.20]), Alzheimer disease (finasteride: HR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.10-1.31]; dutasteride: HR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.09-1.50]), vascular dementia (finasteride: HR, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.30-1.58]; dutasteride: HR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.08-1.59]), and depression (finasteride: HR, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.48-1.75]; dutasteride: HR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.43-1.96]). However, the magnitude of the association decreased over time, and the findings became statistically nonsignificant with continuous exposures over 4 years, except for depression, which showed a constant risk over time, with no differences between finasteride and dutasteride. In contrast, 5-ARIs were not associated with suicide (finasteride: HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.99-1.49]; dutasteride: HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.62-1.54]). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that, while men receiving 5-ARI treatment showed a higher risk for dementia in the initial periods after starting treatment, the decreasing magnitude of the association over time suggested that the risk may be, entirely or in part, due to increased dementia detection among patients with benign prostate enlargement. Both finasteride and dutasteride were similarly associated with depression with a constant risk over time, while neither drug was associated with suicide. Prescribing clinicians and potential users should be aware of the possible risks for depression associated with 5-ARI use.

Comparison of oral minoxidil, finasteride, and dutasteride for treating androgenetic alopecia.

BACKGROUND: Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is the most common cause of hair loss, often challenging to treat. While oral finasteride (1 mg/d) is an FDA-approved treatment for male AGA, oral minoxidil and oral dutasteride are not approved yet. However, clinicians have been increasingly using these two drugs off-label for hair loss. Recently, Japan and South Korea have approved oral dutasteride (0.5 mg/d) for male AGA. EFFICACY AND SAFETY: A probable efficacy ranking, in decreasing order, is - dutasteride 0.5 mg/d, finasteride 5 mg/d, minoxidil 5 mg/d, finasteride 1 mg/d, followed by minoxidil 0.25 mg/d. Oral minoxidil predominantly causes hypertrichosis and cardiovascular system (CVS) symptoms/signs in a dose-dependent manner, whereas oral finasteride and dutasteride are associated with sexual dysfunction and neuropsychiatric side effects. PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS: The average plasma half-lives of minoxidil, finasteride, and dutasteride are ∼4 h, ∼4.5 h, and ∼5 weeks, respectively. Minoxidil acts through multiple pathways to promote hair growth. It has been shown as a vasodilator, an anti-inflammatory agent, a Wnt/ß-catenin signaling inducer, and an antiandrogen. Finasteride inhibits 5α-reductase (5AR) type II isoenzyme, while dutasteride inhibits both type I and type II. Thus, dutasteride suppresses DHT levels more than finasteride in the serum and scalp.

Post-Finasteride Syndrome. Literature Review.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Post-finasteride syndrome (PFS) is a little known adverse effect of 5α-reductase inhibitor (5-ARI) drugs used in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and androgenetic alopecia. Five articles on the syndrome have been published in Spain, although no review has been published.The objectives of this article are to review the world literature, including the Spanish literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review on post-finasteride syndrome was performed between 2011 and 2020. The search for information in PubMed/Medline was performed using the English terms "post-finasteride, post-finasteride syndrome" and in Google with the Spanish "post-finasteride, síndrome post-finasteride". The results of the variables studied were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 64 worldwide articles on post-finasteride syndrome were found, discarding 24 (37.5%) that did not deal with the symptoms of the syndrome, and 40 articles (62.5%) by 37 authors were included for study, corresponding to 29 publications on case series (72.5%) and 11 reviews (27.5%). Of the 40 articles, 37 referred to male post-finasteride syndrome (92.5%) and 3 to female (7.5%), the number of patients studied in the review was 87,887 corresponding to 87,224 men (99.2%) and 663 women (0.7%), with the number of articles on general symptoms being 23 (57.5%), male sexual symptoms 20 (50%) and female sexual symptoms 1 (2.5%). The articles came from 14 specialties, with Dermatology 14 publications (35%), Urology-Andrology 7 (17.5%) and Pharmacology 6 (15%). The countries with the highest number of publications were the USA 15 (37.5%), Italy 7 (17.5%) and Spain 5 (12.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Finasteride is rarely associated with sexual and systemic adverse effects that constitute the so-called post-finasteride syndrome. There are still few studies on this syndrome in the world. This is the first review of this syndrome in Spain.

Post-Finasteride Syndrome. Literature Review

Introduction and Objectives: Post-finasteride syndrome (PFS) is a little known adverse effect of 5α-reductase inhibitor (5-ARI) drugs used in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and androgenetic alopecia. Five articles on the syndrome have been published in Spain, although no review has been published.The objectives of this article are to review the world literature, including the Spanish literature. Material and Methods: A retrospective review on post-finasteride syndrome was performed between 2011 and 2020. The search for information in PubMed/Medline was performed using the English terms "post-finasteride, post-finasteride syndrome" and in Google with the Spanish "post-finasteride, síndrome post-finasteride". The results of the variables studied were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 64 worldwide articles on post-finasteride syndrome were found, discarding 24 (37.5%) that did not deal with the symptoms of the syndrome, and 40 articles (62.5%) by 37 authors were included for study, corresponding to 29 publications on case series (72.5%) and 11 reviews (27.5%). Of the 40 articles, 37 referred to male post-finasteride syndrome (92.5%) and 3 to female (7.5%), the number of patients studied in the review was 87,887 corresponding to 87,224 men (99.2%) and 663 women (0.7%), with the number of articles on general symptoms being 23 (57.5%), male sexual symptoms 20 (50%) and female sexual symptoms 1 (2.5%). The articles came from 14 specialties, with Dermatology 14 publications (35%), Urology-Andrology 7 (17.5%) and Pharmacology 6 (15%). The countries with the highest number of publications were the USA 15 (37.5%), Italy 7 (17.5%) and Spain 5 (12.5%). Conclusions: Finasteride is rarely associated with sexual and systemic adverse effects that constitute the so-called post-finasteride syndrome. There are still few studies on this syndrome in the world. This is the first review of this syndrome in Spain (AU)

Introducción y Objetivos: El síndrome postfinasteride (SPF) es un efecto adverso poco conocido de losfármacos inhibidores de la enzima 5α reductasa (5-ARI),utilizados en hiperplasia benigna de próstata (HBP) y alopecia androgenética. En España se han publicado 5 artículos sobre el síndrome aunque ninguna revisión. Los objetivos de este artículo son realizar una revisión de la literaturamundial incluida la española.Material y Métodos: Se realiza una revisión retrospectiva sobre el síndrome post-finasteride entre 2011 y2020. La búsqueda de información en PubMed/Medlinese realizó mediante los términos ingleses “post-finasteride,post-finasteride syndrome” y en Google con los españoles“post-finasteride, síndrome post-finasteride”. Los resultados de las variables estudiadas se analizaron mediante estadísticas descriptivas.Resultados: Se encontraron un total de 64 artículosmundiales sobre síndrome post-finasteride descartándose24 (37,5%) que no trataban sobre los síntomas del síndrome,incluyéndose para estudio 40 artículos (62,5%) de 37 autores, correspondientes a 29 publicaciones sobre series decasos (72,5%) y 11 revisiones (27,5%). De los 40 artículos 37 se referían al síndrome post-finasteride masculino(92,5%) y 3 al femenino (7,5%), el nº de pacientes estudiados en la revisión fue 87.887 correspondientes a 87.224hombres (99,2%) y 663 mujeres (0,7%), siendo el nº artículos sobre síntomas generales 23 (57,5%), síntomas sexuales masculinos 20 (50%) y síntomas sexuales femeninos 1 (2,5%). Los artículos procedían de 14 especialidades, destacando Dermatología 14 publicaciones (35%),Urología-Andrología 7 (17,5%) y Farmacología 6 (15%).Los países con mayor nº de publicaciones fueron EE.UU15 (37,5%), Italia 7 (17,5%) y España 5 (12,5%)...(AU)